Ask how much of Indian ecommerce is cash on delivery and you'll hear anything from under 30% to over 75%. Ask for the RTO rate on COD orders and the answers run from about 20% to almost 60%. Most of these numbers aren't wrong. They measure different things on different platforms in different years. This page collects the figures we could trace to a source, says exactly what each one measures and how old it is, and explains why they disagree.
Two rules applied throughout. Every figure links to where it was published. Where we did arithmetic on a source's numbers, the result is marked Derived. Where a widely repeated number couldn't be traced to an original publication, it sits in a separate list at the end and is not used anywhere else on the page.
Key numbers
Different platforms, different definitions. Read the "What it measures" column before quoting any of these side by side.
- RTO (return to origin)
- RTO is an order that was shipped but never delivered, so the courier sends it back to the seller and the seller pays freight both ways.
- NDR (non-delivery report)
- NDR is a failed delivery attempt that can still be recovered; RTO is what it becomes when reattempts fail.
1COD share of orders
The best data is a public filing. Meesho's IPO prospectus discloses its COD share of shipped orders for five periods, so the trend can be read off directly. Meesho is a value-commerce marketplace and not representative of all Indian ecommerce. Its numbers sit at the high end of every range below.
| Figure | What it measures | Period | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| 88.71% | COD orders as % of shipped orders on Meesho | FY2023 (Apr 2022–Mar 2023) | Meesho Ltd, Red Herring Prospectus, risk factor 6 (p. 96–97), 2025 |
| 85.39% | Same measure | FY2024 | Meesho RHP, 2025 |
| 76.95% | Same measure | FY2025 | Meesho RHP, 2025 |
| 72.00% | Same measure (prepaid 28.00%) | Six months to Sep 30, 2025 | Meesho RHP, 2025; also reported by MediaNama, Dec 2025 |
| 60–65% | Share of all Indian ecommerce orders placed via COD | 2024 | ET Prime Research, as cited by Dazeinfo (Jun 2024) and Razorpay (updated Jun 2026). We could not access the underlying ET Prime piece. |
| ~65% | Share of surveyed consumers who paid by COD in their last online purchase (35,000+ respondents, 25 states). COD was more common for fashion. | Fieldwork May–Sep 2022; published Feb 2024 | IIM Ahmedabad, "Digital Retail Channels and Consumers: The Indian Perspective" |
| ~60% | COD share of transactions among D2C brands on GoKwik's network (stated as a 60:40 COD-to-prepaid split) | 2024 | A GoKwik product head, in an Inc42 feature in its BrandLabs (branded content) section, Nov 2024 |
| 28% (from 41%) | COD share of ecommerce shipments, Aug–Sep 2020, against a pre-COVID level of 41% | 2020 | Redseer, as reported by Mint; republished by Redseer, Oct 2020 |
| Qualitative | Quick commerce has "lower reliance on cash-on-delivery compared to traditional e-retail". No ratio is given in the public summary. | 2025 | Bain & Company with Flipkart, "How India Shops Online 2026" |
| Qualitative | A "shift from cash-on-delivery to Unified Payments Interface (UPI) at delivery" | 2025 | Bain & Flipkart, "How India Shops Online 2026" |
Where COD lives: the Tier 2+ context
Every source above agrees, qualitatively, that COD is heavier outside the metros. We found no recent public dataset that gives COD share by city tier with a stated method, so treat any precise tier-level COD percentage you see with caution. What is well documented is where order growth is coming from. That matters because new and smaller-town shoppers are the ones who default to COD:
| Figure | What it measures | Period | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ~65% | Share of new e-retail shoppers acquired from Tier 2+ cities | 2024–25 | Bain & Flipkart, HISO 2026 |
| ~50% | Share of incremental e-retail orders (2025 vs 2024) from Tier 2+ cities | 2025 | Bain & Flipkart, HISO 2026 |
| 66% | Share of incremental D2C order volume from Tier 2 and 3 cities, across 6,000+ D2C brands on Unicommerce | FY2026 (Apr 2025–Feb 2026) | Unicommerce, India D2C Report 2026 |
| 24.07 bn | UPI transactions in a single month (₹29.37 lakh crore), all use cases, not just ecommerce | Sep 2026 | NPCI data, as reported by Outlook Money; NPCI UPI statistics |
Shoppers clearly use UPI. Yet COD still accounts for most orders on mass-market platforms. The usual explanation is a trust gap: paying before the parcel arrives is a different decision from paying for something you can see. Bain's finding that more COD shoppers now pay by UPI at the doorstep fits that explanation, though it doesn't prove it. To a courier, an order paid by UPI at the door is still a COD order. It can still be refused.
2RTO: COD vs prepaid
RTO (return to origin) is an order that was shipped but never delivered, so it goes back to the seller. It's different from a customer return, where the product was delivered and later sent back. Some of the figures below measure RTO strictly. Others measure "returns", which mix the two. The second column says which.
| Figure | What it measures | Period | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| 75.85% / 96.39% | Delivery success rate for COD / prepaid shipped orders on Meesho ("successfully delivered, regardless of whether the product was subsequently returned") | Six months to Sep 30, 2025 | Meesho RHP, 2025 |
| 24.2% / 3.6% Derived | Share of COD / prepaid shipped orders not delivered (100% minus the success rates above). Close to an RTO rate, but the filing does not say whether lost or damaged shipments are included. | Six months to Sep 30, 2025 | Computed from Meesho RHP |
| 22.3% / 2.7% Derived | Same measure (success rates 77.70% / 97.28%) | FY2025 | Computed from Meesho RHP |
| 23.4% / 3.2% Derived | Same measure (success rates 76.57% / 96.76%) | FY2023 | Computed from Meesho RHP |
| ~94% Derived | Share of all Meesho non-deliveries that were COD orders, although COD was 72% of shipped orders | Six months to Sep 30, 2025 | Computed from Meesho RHP (0.72 × 24.15% ÷ [0.72 × 24.15% + 0.28 × 3.61%]) |
| 26% / <2% | RTO rate on COD / prepaid orders across Shipway's shipping platform (RTO defined as shipped but not delivered and returned to seller) | FY2025 | Shipway, "ShipNotes" report, as reported by Mediabrief, Jul 2025 |
| 25–30% / 2–3% | Share of COD / prepaid orders ending in RTO, Indian ecommerce | 2024 | ET Prime Research, as cited by Dazeinfo, Jun 2024. Dazeinfo attributes the 25–30% COD figure to ET Prime; the 2–3% prepaid figure follows without a named source. |
| 20–25%, up to ~40% | Average RTO rate (all payment types) across Indian ecommerce, rising to nearly 40% depending on category, geography and pin codes, per GoKwik's data. The same feature quotes 30–40% for COD orders. | 2024 | Inc42 feature with GoKwik (BrandLabs, branded content), Nov 2024 |
| 20.9% / 5.8% | "Return rate" for COD / prepaid orders across Unicommerce's platform. The release does not separate RTO from customer returns. | FY2023 (FY2022: 19.3% / 5.6%) | Unicommerce, India e-Commerce Index, via CXOToday, Aug 2023 |
| 10.4% | Overall return rate, all orders, same index (FY2022: 9.8%). D2C brand sites: 6.2%. Marketplaces: 26.3%, which the release words as returns that "grew by 26.3%" (24.2% in FY2022); read side by side it is most likely a rate, but the wording is ambiguous. | FY2023 | Unicommerce, via CXOToday, Aug 2023 |
The level varies, but every source puts COD failure several times higher than prepaid. Meesho's filing shows about 7–8x in FY2023 and FY2025 and 6.7x in the six months to September 2025 Derived. Shipway shows more than 13x. Unicommerce's broader "returns" measure shows 3–4x. For a single platform-wide COD RTO figure, the two traceable FY2025 data points are about 22% (Meesho, derived) and 26% (Shipway).
3RTO by city, zone, speed and order value
Shipway's FY2025 report is the most detailed public breakdown we found. It covers COD ("non-prepaid") orders. City figures include only cities with at least 5,000 such orders in the year.
| Figure | What it measures | Period | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18% | Lowest city RTO: Vadodara (Thrissur, Mumbai, Kolkata and Chandigarh also among the lowest) | FY2025 | Shipway ShipNotes via Mediabrief |
| 35% | Highest city RTO: Patna (Srinagar, Jaipur, Varanasi and Ranchi also among the highest) | FY2025 | Shipway ShipNotes |
| 20% → 28% | RTO by courier zone: intra-city 20%, intra-state 23%, metro-to-metro 22%, inter-state non-metro 27%, special zones (North East, J&K) 28% | FY2025 | Shipway ShipNotes |
| 22% → 35% | RTO by time to delivery attempt: 1–2 days 22%, 3–5 days 27%, over 5 days 35% | FY2025 | Shipway ShipNotes |
| 25% / 28% / 24% | RTO by order value: under ₹500 / ₹500–1,000 / over ₹1,000 | FY2025 | Shipway ShipNotes |
The gap between zones and between delivery speeds is as large as the gap between cities. This suggests geography acts partly through transit time. A customer who waits five days is more likely to have bought elsewhere, changed their mind or stopped answering the courier. The report shows correlation, not cause.
4The festive spike
| Figure | What it measures | Period | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| 58% / under 15% | Share of COD / prepaid orders that "came back" during the festive quarter, D2C brands on Unicommerce. The report does not say whether this is RTO only or RTO plus customer returns. | Festive quarter of FY2026 | Unicommerce, India D2C Report 2026 (6,000+ brands, 410M+ shipments) |
| 39.2% → 21.0% | RTO at the November 2025 festive peak, and the level reached by March 2026. The report's chart labels the March figure "optimised brands", while its text describes one brand moving from 39% to 21%. Treat it as an example, not a platform average. | Nov 2025–Mar 2026 | Unicommerce, India D2C Report 2026 |
| −26% | Reported fall in the COD RTO rate for brands on GoKwik's network (1,000+ brands) at the start of the 2023 festive season. The article gives no exact comparison period. This is the vendor's own outcome claim, not a market benchmark. | Festive season 2023 | GoKwik, via Business Today, Oct 2023 |
Treat the Unicommerce festive figures as a direction, not a precise level. The "58%" has been read in two ways. Unicommerce calls them orders that "came back". Some vendor blogs restate it as "58% of COD orders end up as RTO". Both readings agree on the direction: COD returns rise sharply in the festive quarter, far more than prepaid returns do.
5RTO by category
This is the most-searched cut and the worst-sourced. We could not find a public category-level RTO dataset with a stated sample and method. Here is what can be attributed:
| Figure | What it measures | Period | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qualitative | COD use "more prevalent" for fashion and clothing purchases (consumer survey) | Fieldwork 2022 | IIM Ahmedabad, Feb 2024 |
| >35–40% | RTO in fashion "can exceed" this for COD orders. No method or sample given. | Page updated Jun 2026 | Razorpay blog (vendor) |
| Fashion 25–40%; footwear 20–35%; ethnic wear 30–45%; electronics 8–18%; grocery 2–8% | "Average" RTO ranges by category. Presented without a cited dataset. | 2026 | Base.com blog (vendor) |
The direction is consistent: fashion, footwear and ethnic wear sit highest, and electronics and grocery lowest. We'd treat the specific ranges as practitioner estimates, not measured benchmarks. If you run a logistics or checkout platform and can publish category RTO with a sample size, tell us and we'll add it with credit.
6What one RTO costs
No public source publishes a market-wide average cost per RTO. What can be sourced are the components.
| Figure | What it measures | Period | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ₹36–45 | Average forward cost per shipment as listed by plan (₹36 on Pro to ₹45 on Lite), on Shiprocket. The page marks it "Avg shipment cost*" without explaining the asterisk. | As listed Oct 2026 | Shiprocket pricing page |
| 5–15% below forward | Shiprocket's stated RTO freight relative to forward freight, from an old comparison page (its introduction says "about 5–10%", its table "5–15% less"). Current RTO charges depend on weight and zone. | 2017 | Shiprocket blog |
| ₹7–10 | Per-order COD fees some large platforms charge shoppers. Upstox cites "reports" without naming one. | Updated Nov 2025 | As reported by Upstox |
| ~₹70–90 Derived | Freight alone for one RTO (forward leg plus a return leg at roughly the forward rate), using Shiprocket's average shipment cost. Excludes packaging, COD handling, damage, blocked inventory and acquisition cost. | 2026 | Arithmetic on Shiprocket's listed averages |
The fully loaded cost depends on things only the brand knows: packaging, the share of returned units that can't be resold, working capital tied up in transit, and above all the acquisition cost already spent on an order that never converts. Our RTO calculator starts from ₹250 per RTO. That's our own default assumption, not an industry benchmark, and you can replace it with your own numbers.
Benchmarks tell you where others sit. Your cost depends on your order volume, your RTO rate and what one RTO costs you. The free RTO calculator works it out per month in about 30 seconds.
7NDR and fake COD orders
NDR (non-delivery report) is the courier's flag that a delivery attempt failed, for reasons like "customer not available", "refused" or "address incomplete". Unresolved NDRs become RTOs. We found no public NDR benchmark with a disclosed sample. ClickPost, a logistics software vendor, gives a range of 20–40% by category (Sep 2026) without a cited dataset. Shipway's finding that RTO climbs from 22% to 35% as the first attempt slips past five days is the closest measured evidence that NDR handling speed matters.
Fake or fraudulent COD orders are a common talking point. We could not trace any of the percentages in circulation to a published dataset (see the next section). The best primary signal is indirect. Meesho's prospectus says it may restrict COD for "repeat offenders" or charge a convenience fee to consumers with high RTO rates. A platform wouldn't build that unless a small group of buyers caused a large share of failed deliveries, but the filing gives no figure for it.
8Why the numbers disagree
- Different denominators. "COD share" can mean share of orders, of shipments, of GMV, or of consumers whose last purchase was COD (the IIMA 65%). Shipments exclude orders cancelled before dispatch, and value shares fall below volume shares because COD skews to lower order values. "RTO rate" can be measured against all shipped orders, COD orders only, or "returns" that also include customer-initiated returns (Unicommerce's 20.9%).
- Platform mix. A value marketplace (Meesho, 72–77% COD), a D2C checkout network (GoKwik, about 60%), all-ecommerce shipments (Redseer 2020, 28%) and quick commerce (lower COD reliance than e-retail, per Bain) are different populations. A single "India COD share" blends them, and the weights change with each source's coverage.
- D2C vs marketplace. Marketplaces showed about 26.3% returns and D2C sites 6.2% in Unicommerce's FY2023 index (the marketplace figure's wording is ambiguous; see section 2). Marketplace return policies and buyer mix differ from brand sites. Benchmarks from one shouldn't be applied to the other.
- Year and season. COD share dropped during COVID (41% to 28% of shipments in 2020), then rose again with Tier 2+ growth, and is now falling on Meesho (88.7% in FY2023 to 72% in 2025). Festive quarters push COD returns far above annual averages (Unicommerce's 58% festive figure against a 20.9% annual one, though the years differ).
- Selection bias in vendor data. Most RTO figures come from companies that sell RTO-reduction, checkout or shipping software. Their samples are their customers, often brands that signed up because RTO was a problem. Their RTO figures may also already reflect their own tools. That doesn't make the numbers wrong, but they aren't random samples of the market.
- Citation chains. Many figures that look independent trace back to a single original, and some to none we could find. "26% COD vs under 2% prepaid" appears across dozens of blogs. The traceable original is Shipway's FY2025 report, though some blogs attribute it to GoKwik. "60–65% COD" traces to a 2024 ET Prime piece we couldn't access. The more often a number is repeated, the more important it is to find where it started.
9Widely repeated, not verified
These figures circulate widely in industry blogs and decks. We tried to trace each one to a primary publication and couldn't, so we haven't used them above. If you know the original source, send it and we'll move the figure into the tables.
| Claim | Usually attributed to | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| ₹20,000 crore+ a year lost to RTO | Redseer | Repeated by Razorpay (unattributed) and Upstox (attributed to Redseer). No Redseer publication found. |
| ₹8,000 crore a year lost to RTO by D2C brands | "Multiple reports" | Vendor blogs only; no original found |
| 8–15% of COD orders are fake or fraudulent | Various vendor blogs | No report located |
| COD is 70–80% of orders in Tier 2/3; "88% in Bihar" | Various | No dated dataset with method located |
| Category RTO such as "fashion 35–45%, footwear 38–48%, books 10–15%" | Various | No dataset located; see section 5 for what can be attributed |
10Methodology
Limitations: several sources are vendors with a commercial interest in RTO being seen as high, us included. Corrections and new sources: hello@callfox.in.
Cite this page
You're welcome to quote any figure here. Please cite the original source linked in the table, and link this page if it helped you find or reconcile it.
FAQ
What is the average RTO rate in India?
For COD orders, the two traceable FY2025 figures are about 22% on Meesho (derived from its prospectus) and 26% across Shipway's shipping platform. Prepaid orders fail far less often: under 2% on Shipway and about 3% on Meesho. Averages that mix COD and prepaid come out lower, so always check which one a figure measures.
What is a good RTO rate?
There's no published standard. As reference points, Shipway's FY2025 data shows COD RTO of 18% in its best large city (Vadodara) against 26% overall and 35% in its worst (Patna), and 22% when the first delivery attempt happens within 1–2 days. A COD RTO rate below about 20% is at the better end of the traceable data; prepaid orders typically sit under 2–4%.
Why do customers refuse COD deliveries?
No public dataset gives a breakdown of refusal reasons with a stated sample. What is measured is that delay matters: on Shipway's platform, COD RTO rises from 22% when the first attempt is made in 1–2 days to 35% after more than 5 days. Courier NDR codes such as "customer not available", "refused" and "address incomplete" show the common failure points, and Meesho's prospectus notes a small group of repeat offenders that it may restrict from COD.
What share of Indian ecommerce orders are COD?
It depends on the platform. Meesho reported 72% of shipped orders on COD in April–September 2025, down from 88.7% in FY2023. ET Prime Research, as cited by Dazeinfo, put it at 60–65% of all Indian ecommerce orders in 2024, and GoKwik described a 60:40 COD-to-prepaid split across its D2C brands. In an IIM Ahmedabad survey, about 65% of consumers paid by COD in their last online purchase.
Using these numbers
Your own RTO rate, split by payment method, pin-code zone and month, will tell you more than any benchmark here. If you want to see what a given RTO rate costs at your order volume, the RTO calculator takes your inputs. If you're curious how pre-dispatch confirmation calls work as one RTO lever among several, here's how Callfox does it.
Calling COD customers before you ship.
Callfox's AI calls each COD customer in Hindi, Hinglish or English, confirms the order before dispatch and tags the result in Shopify. Hear a live call on the homepage, or start with 30 free minutes.
Hear a live call